American Electric Power (NYSE:  AEP) announced  in a lengthy and detailed company press release its plan for complying with  a series of proposed regulations which it said would impact coal-fueled power  plants. AEP said that based on the regulations as  proposed, its compliance plan would  retire nearly 6,000 megawatts (MW) of coal-fueled power generation; upgrade or  install new advanced emissions reduction equipment on another 10,100 MW; refuel  1,070 MW of coal generation as 932 MW of natural gas capacity; and build 1,220  MW of natural gas-fueled generation. The cost of  AEP's compliance plan could range from $6  billion to $8 billion in capital investment through the end of the decade. The  company said that high demand for labor and materials due to a constrained  compliance time frame could drive actual costs higher than these estimates. AEP  noted, "The plan, including retirements, could change significantly depending on  the final form of the EPA regulations and regulatory approvals from state  commissions."     According to the release, the  retirements and retrofits in the plan are in addition to more than $7.2 billion  that AEP has invested since 1990 to reduce  emissions from its coal-fueled generation fleet. "Annual emissions of nitrogen  oxides from AEP plants are 80 percent lower  today than in 1990. Sulfur dioxide emissions from  AEP plants are 73 percent lower than in  1990." The company currently owns nearly 25,000 MW of coal-fueled generation,  approximately 65 percent of its total generating capacity. Coal would fuel  approximately 57 percent of AEP's total  generating capacity by the end of the decade.
     Michael Morris,  AEP chairman and chief executive officer  said, "We support regulations that achieve long-term environmental benefits  while protecting customers, the economy and the reliability of the electric  grid, but the cumulative impacts of the EPA's current regulatory path have been  vastly underestimated, particularly in Midwest states dependent on coal to fuel  their economies. We have worked for months to develop a compliance plan that  will mitigate the impact of these rules for our customers and preserve jobs, but  because of the unrealistic compliance timelines in the EPA proposals, we will  have to prematurely shut down nearly 25 percent of our current coal-fueled  generating capacity, cut hundreds of good power plant jobs, and invest billions  of dollars in capital to retire, retrofit and replace coal-fueled power plants.  The sudden increase in electricity rates and impacts on state economies will be  significant at a time when people and states are still struggling."
     The company said although some jobs  would be created from the installation of emissions reduction equipment,  AEP expects a net loss of approximately 600  power plant jobs with annual wages totaling approximately $40 million as a  result of compliance with the proposed EPA rules. Morris said, "We are deeply  concerned about the impact of the proposed regulations on our customers and  local economies. Communities that have depended on these plants to provide good  jobs and support local services will face significant reductions in payroll and  property taxes in a very short period of time. The economic impact will extend  far beyond direct employment at power plants as thousands of ancillary jobs are  supported by every coal-fueled generating unit. Businesses that have benefited  from reasonably priced coal-fueled power will face the impact of electricity  price increases ranging from 10 percent to more than 35 percent just for  compliance with these environmental rules at a time when they are still trying  to recover from the economic downturn." 
     "Although discounted by some, the  potential impacts on the reliability of the transmission system, particularly in  the Midwest, are significant. The proposed timelines for compliance aren't  adequate for construction of significant retrofits or replacement generation, so  many coal-fueled plants would be prematurely retired or idled in just a few  years. AEP's compliance plan alone would  abruptly cut generation capacity in the Midwest by more than 5,400 MW. Depending  on the year, another 1,500 MW to 5,200 MW of  AEP generation would be idled or curtailed  for extended periods as pollution control equipment is installed," Morris  said.
     AEP  said it has shared its compliance plan with PJM Interconnection, Southwest Power  Pool and North American Electric Reliability Corp. for use in their evaluation  of the impacts of EPA's proposed rules. Morris said, "We will continue to  work through the EPA process with the hope that the agency will recognize the  cumulative impact of the proposed rules and develop a more reasonable compliance  schedule. We also will continue talking with lawmakers in Washington about a  legislative approach that would achieve the same long-term environmental goals  with less negative impact on jobs and the U.S. economy. With more time and  flexibility, we will get to the same level of emission reductions, but it will  cost our customers less and will prevent premature job losses, extend the  construction job benefits, and ensure the ongoing reliability of the electric  system."    
     U.S. Senator Joe  Manchin (D-WV) issued a statement regarding what he said was AEP's "plans to  shut down three plants in West Virginia, resulting in 242 lost jobs." He  said, "Let me be clear, it's decisions like the one made by AEP today that  demonstrate the urgent need to rein in government agencies like the EPA,  preventing them from overstepping their bounds and imposing regulations that not  only cost us good American jobs, but hurt our economy. Onerous regulations  issued by the EPA are the reason that 242 West Virginians will lose their jobs,  and that's simply wrong. It is because of out-of-control agencies like the EPA  as well as the need to protect American jobs that I sponsored the REINS Act  [Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny, H.R.10 & S.299]-- a  commonsense measure that will help protect and create jobs by reigning in  needless or burdensome regulations, and that will put responsibility back where  it belongs -- in the hands of the people who are elected to govern and lead this  great nation."