Jan 18: In a surprising Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, President  Obama announced a new Executive Order -- "Improving Regulation and Regulatory  Review" -- calling for a government-wide review of regulations, regulatory  improvement, elimination of unnecessary paperwork and a special focus on  eliminating burdens for small business. The President said:  
     "For two  centuries, America's free market has not only been the source of dazzling ideas  and path-breaking products, it has also been the greatest force for prosperity  the world has ever known. That vibrant entrepreneurialism is the key to our  continued global leadership and the success of our people. But throughout our history, one of the reasons the free market has  worked is that we have sought the proper balance. We have preserved freedom of  commerce while applying those rules and regulations necessary to protect the  public against threats to our health and safety and to safeguard people and  businesses from abuse.
  
     "From child labor  laws to the Clean Air Act to our most recent strictures against hidden fees and  penalties by credit card companies, we have, from time to time, embraced common  sense rules of the road that strengthen our country without unduly interfering  with the pursuit of progress and the growth of our economy. 
  
     "Sometimes, those  rules have gotten out of balance, placing unreasonable burdens on business --  burdens that have stifled innovation and have had a chilling effect on growth  and jobs. At other times, we have failed to meet our basic responsibility to  protect the public interest, leading to disastrous consequences. Such was the  case in the run-up to the financial crisis from which we are still recovering.  There, a lack of proper oversight and transparency nearly led to the collapse of  the financial markets and a full-scale Depression.
  
     "Over the  past two years, the goal of my administration has been to strike the right  balance. And today, I am signing an executive order that makes clear that this  is the operating principle of our government. This order requires that federal agencies ensure that regulations  protect our safety, health and environment while promoting economic growth. And  it orders a government-wide review of the rules already on the books to remove  outdated regulations that stifle job creation and make our economy less  competitive. It's a review that will help bring order to regulations that have  become a patchwork of overlapping rules, the result of tinkering by  administrations and legislators of both parties and the influence of special  interests in Washington over decades.
  
     "Where necessary, we won't shy away from  addressing obvious gaps: new safety rules for infant formula; procedures to stop  preventable infections in hospitals; efforts to target chronic violators of  workplace safety laws. But we are also making it our mission to root out  regulations that conflict, that are not worth the cost, or that are just plain  dumb. For instance, the FDA has long considered  saccharin, the artificial sweetener, safe for people to consume. Yet for years,  the EPA made companies treat saccharin like other dangerous chemicals. Well, if  it goes in your coffee, it is not hazardous waste. The EPA wisely eliminated  this rule last month.
  
     "But creating a  21st-century regulatory system is about more than which rules to add and which  rules to subtract. As the executive order I am signing makes clear, we are  seeking more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve the same ends -- giving  careful consideration to benefits and costs. This means writing rules with more  input from experts, businesses and ordinary citizens. It means using disclosure  as a tool to inform consumers of their choices, rather than restricting those  choices. And it means making sure the government does more of its work online,  just like companies are doing.
  
     "We're also  getting rid of absurd and unnecessary paperwork requirements that waste time and  money. We're looking at the system as a whole to make sure we avoid excessive,  inconsistent and redundant regulation. And finally, today I am directing federal  agencies to do more to account for -- and reduce -- the burdens regulations may  place on small businesses. Small firms drive growth and create most new jobs in  this country. We need to make sure nothing stands in their way.
  
     "One important  example of this overall approach is the fuel-economy standards for cars and  trucks. When I took office, the country faced years of litigation and confusion  because of conflicting rules set by Congress, federal regulators and states  [See  WIMS 5/19/09].   
     "The EPA and the  Department of Transportation worked with auto makers, labor unions, states like  California, and environmental advocates this past spring to turn a tangle of  rules into one aggressive new standard [See  WIMS 4/1/10]. It was a victory for car companies that wanted regulatory  certainty; for consumers who will pay less at the pump; for our security, as we  save 1.8 billion barrels of oil; and for the environment as we reduce pollution.  Another example: Tomorrow the FDA will lay out a new effort to improve the  process for approving medical devices, to keep patients safer while getting  innovative and life-saving products to market faster.   
     "Despite a  lot of heated rhetoric, our efforts over the past two years to modernize our  regulations have led to smarter -- and in some cases tougher -- rules to protect  our health, safety and environment. Yet according to current estimates of their  economic impact, the benefits of these regulations exceed their costs by  billions of dollars. This is the lesson of our  history: Our economy is not a zero-sum game. Regulations do have costs; often,  as a country, we have to make tough decisions about whether those costs are  necessary. But what is clear is that we can strike the right balance. We can  make our economy stronger and more competitive, while meeting our fundamental  responsibilities to one another."
  
      In addition to the  Executive Order, the President also issued two Presidential Memorandums -- one  on Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement (Memo #1); and another on Regulatory  Flexibility, Small Business, and Job Creation (Memo #2). The Regulatory  Compliance and Enforcement Memo requires Federal enforcement agencies to make  publicly-available compliance information easily accessible, downloadable, and  searchable online. This will provide citizens with information they need to  determine when entities fail to comply with the law.    
      The Regulatory Flexibility, Small Business, and Job Creation Memo requires  Federal agencies to consider ways to reduce regulatory burdens on small business  and requiring that Agencies provide justifications when such flexibilities are  not included in proposed regulation. Agencies will not only be required to  consider these alternatives for small businesses, but also to provide written  justification when such alternatives are not utilized.
  
     Jack Lew Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)  commented on the President's actions in a White House blog post. Lew said, "OMB  plays a central role in implementing a President's regulatory agenda. Through  our Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), OMB acts as a  clearinghouse for the most significant regulations and rules, making sure that  policies are consistent across the federal government and with the agenda of the  President. OMB also ensures that analysis of rules is done properly,  according to one set of standards."       Lew indicated as the President wrote,  our aim is to "strike the right balance" between what is needed to protect the  safety and health of all Americans, and what we need to foster economic growth,  job creation, and competitiveness. He said, "The Administration has followed  this balanced approach since taking office, and this executive order formally  details our basic operating principles. With this EO, there should be no  confusion about what guides this Administration when crafting regulations.  The basic tenets are: to consider costs and how best to reduce burdens for  American businesses and consumers; to expand opportunities for public  participation and stakeholder involvement; to seek the most flexible, least  burdensome approaches; to ensure that regulations are scientifically-driven; and  to review old regulations so that rules which are no longer needed can be  modified or withdrawn. This smarter approach builds on the best practices of the  past, while adapting to serious economic challenges the country faces today. .  ." 
        The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) Senior Vice President  for Government Relations and Policy, Aric Newhouse issued a statement commenting  on the President's executive order saying, "Manufacturers appreciate President Obama's call for a  government-wide review of regulations and rules. Manufacturers have been  saying for some time that overregulation is harming job creation and stifling  economic growth. This is an opportunity for the  President to demonstrate results by eliminating unnecessary regulations already  in the pipeline or delaying poorly thought-out proposals that are costing jobs.  For example, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposals -- from  regulating greenhouse gases to the Boiler MACT rule -- are a real threat to  America's job creators. We stand ready to assist in the President's efforts to  address an escalating problem and meaningfully reduce unnecessary burdens on  manufacturers in America so they can get back to creating  jobs."  
  
     U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas  Donohue issued a statement saying, "We welcome President Obama's intention to  issue an executive order today restoring balance to government regulations.  While a positive first step, a robust and globally competitive economy requires  fundamental reform of our broken regulatory system. Congress should reclaim some  of the authority it has delegated to the agencies and implement effective checks  and balances on agency power. It also means repealing or replacing outdated or  ineffective regulations, ensuring realistic cost-benefit analyses using quality  data. No major rule or regulation should be exempted from the review, including  the recently enacted health care and financial reform laws. The Chamber shares  the president's view that we should 'root out regulations that conflict, that  are not worth the cost, or that are just plain dumb.' And the Chamber will work  with the White House, Congress, and the federal agencies to advance common sense  regulatory reform measures."  
  
     The regulatory watchdog  group, OMB Watch Executive Director Gary Bass issued a release  saying,"Unfortunately, President Obama's regulatory executive order does little  to change the mechanics of a broken regulatory process. The order reflects,  however, the values the administration has stressed in its two years in office:  greater public participation, decisions based on the best available science and  technology, and greater agency flexibility. The RFA's [Regulatory  Flexibility Act] requirements already burden agencies with procedural hurdles  that can delay critical public protections. This memo may very well be taken as  an insult by the federal agencies, which write reasoned, evidence-based rules  now; those rules would never be approved if they were based on  'guesswork'"
  
   
   THE REST  OF TODAY'S NEWS
-  U.N. Head Calls For Global Energy Revolution
- EPA & SBA Launch  Water Technology Innovation Cluster - U.S.  Chamber Interview With Speaker Boehner
- The Wilderness Society v. U.S.  Forest Service
- U.S. Magnesium, LLC v.  EPA
(Click here for details)