Friday, March 08, 2013

USGCRP Releases Our Changing Planet Report

Mar 8: The Administration's interagency U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) delivered its annual report to Congress entitled, Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. The report indicates that it is also, "A Supplement to the President's Budget for Fiscal Year 2013" and highlights recent activities by 13 Federal agencies to strengthen the scientific understanding of global changes -- including climate change -- the threats and opportunities they present, and how they are likely to evolve over time.

    USGCRP's scientific portfolio spans multiple systems and scales, from organisms to ecosystems to the entire planet -- including changes brought about by human behavior as well as by larger natural forces. It incorporates information from nearly all forms of scientific work, including laboratory experiments, field research, computer modeling, scientific assessment, and observations of Earth from land, air, sea, and space. The vast body of work has been carried out by 13 government agencies -- all working together to paint a clearer picture of global change so that citizens and decision makers have the information they need to plan, prepare, and respond.

    USGCRP indicates that the benefits of this work extend far beyond pure science into domains that are directly relevant to the day-to-day lives of Americans and others around the world. They support weather forecasting, water and land resource management, agricultural crop production, and many other functions that impact lives, livelihoods, and communities. The report showcases tangible results of work carried out by USGCRP agencies, including, for example, some of the most detailed, data-rich maps of Alaskan permafrost ever generated; the most precise map ever produced of carbon stored in Earth's tropical forests; critical information about the number and magnitude of extreme weather events in the United States; and updated maps that help gardeners and growers plan for harvesting seasons.

    For more than two decades USGCRP has continued to fulfill the Congressional mandate to "understand, assess, predict, and respond to human-induced and natural processes of global change." Building on 20 years of scientific experience, USGCRP scientists continue to expand the knowledge of Earth's past and present climate, improve projections of future climate change, and achieve a better understanding of the impacts and risks associated with global change -- all with the aim of getting practical information, useful tools, and reliable data into the hands of those who need it.

    The report indicates that, "Global change is happening now. Increases in population, industrialization, and human activities have altered the world's climate, oceans, land, ice cover, and ecosystems. In the United States, climate change has already resulted in more frequent heat waves, extreme precipitation, wildfires, and water scarcity. These are serious challenges that directly affect American families, communities, and jobs. The only way to respond effectively is with a sound understanding of the changes underway, the threats and opportunities they present, and how they will change over time. . . "

    The report notes that the USGCRP is designed to coordinate the Federal Government's $2.6 billion annual investment in global change research -- the largest such investment in the world. A new Research Plan for 2012-2021 lays out clear goals and objectives to achieve an ambitious new emphasis, including the expansion of stakeholder participation in all stages of the scientific process, and dissemination of results and information to broad audiences, including the public [See WIMS 4/30/12]. Data collected and reported by USGCRP agencies indicate for example:

  • In 2011, the United States experienced a record-breaking 14 weather disasters producing insured losses of more than $1B each. The previous record was nine, set in 2008.
  • The average temperature for the contiguous United States during July 2012 was the hottest for any month on record (since 1895).
  • In the United States, the 12-month period ending July 31, 2012 was the warmest since recordkeeping began in 1895
    and NOAA announced in December 2012 that 2012 was poised to go down in the record books as the hottest since 1895.
  • During July 2012, 2.01 million acres were burned by wildfires in the United States -- the 4th largest extent on record. In the same month, 9,869 fires burned -- the 5th highest number on record for July over the past dozen years.
  • 62.9 percent of the contiguous United States experienced moderate to exceptional drought at the end of July 2012. The maximum value of 63.9 percent reached on July 24 set a record for the 13-year history of the United States Drought Monitor
  • The National Snow and Ice Data Center -- an interagency center funded jointly by NASA, NOAA, and NSF -- recently reported that Arctic sea ice reached its lowest-ever measured extent in September 2012.
    Increasingly, decision makers are adopting an array of climate adaptation policies, plans, and actions. Moving forward, it will be critical to evaluate what works, what fails, and where more scientific support is needed. USGCRP is working to meet this need by monitoring and evaluating adaptation actions taking place on the ground. This will help decision makers determine whether their adaptation actions are successful and how they can be enhanced.
 
    The report also indicates that, "Climate change poses potentially serious challenges to human health, including increased heat stress mortality, increases in diarrheal disease, degraded air and water quality, changes in vector-borne disease patterns, more severe pollen seasons, and danger from more frequent extreme weather events. In addition to threatening human well-being, these challenges can also contribute to increased healthcare costs."
 
    USGCRP has identified five priority areas of focus for FY 2013 including: Integrated Observations, Research and Modeling for Earth and Social Systems; Adaptation Research; Sustained Assessments; Interagency Global Change Information System; and Communications, Education, and Engagement. The FY 2013 budget request for USGCRP programs is $2.7 billion -- an increase of approximately 7 percent over the 2012 enacted level.

    Access a posted announcement of the new report (click here). Access the complete 67-page report (click here). Access the USGCRP website for more information (click here). [#Climate]

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Thursday, March 07, 2013

NatLab Partnership Releases Green Infrastructure Financing Guide

Mar 7: In the wake of Superstorm Sandy and 2012's unparalleled extreme weather events, a new groundbreaking green infrastructure financing guide was released by the NatLab consortium -- a path-breaking collaboration between two of the world's leading environmental organizations, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and The Nature Conservancy, and sustainable asset management firm EKO Asset Management Partners. 

    The report, which was developed in collaboration with the Philadelphia Water Department (PWD) and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, focuses on Philadelphia's innovative Green City, Clean Waters program as a model for stimulating investment in natural infrastructure. It demonstrates how local municipalities and state government can potentially drive billions of dollars of private investment to modernize broken, aging stormwater systems and keep stormwater pollution out of waterways. Nearly 10 trillion gallons of polluted runoff -- sometimes mixed with raw sewage -- are currently dumped into local rivers, lakes, beaches, and drinking water supplies annually.

    Dr. Judith Rodin, President of The Rockefeller Foundation said, "Governments across the country must find new and innovative ways to build infrastructure that is resilient to nature's shocks and stresses. The Rockefeller Foundation is proud to support the creation of such a critical tool for local leaders to understand the best practices for leveraging private dollars to support public infrastructure projects such as stormwater system repair.  It will only be through innovative partnerships across sectors that we are able to build truly resilient cities."

    NatLab's report, "Creating Clean Water Cash Flows," and companion report, "Greening Vacant Lots," validates the business case for both innovative public policy and private investment in green infrastructure by drawing from lessons from the energy efficiency finance sphere. The report provides in-depth guidance on key strategies that cities can deploy to attract private capital to green infrastructure development on private as well as public land, including: project aggregation, offsite mitigation and credit trading programs, subsidies, private-public partnerships, and transformation of vacant lands.

    Natural infrastructure -- such as porous pavement, green roofs, parks, roadside plantings and rain barrels -- addresses stormwater pollution by capturing rain on or near where it falls, preventing the rain from carrying runoff from dirty streets to local waterways and oceans, instead storing the rain or allowing it to naturally filter back into the ground. These sustainable practices not only restore the health of local waterways, but also beautify neighborhoods, cool and cleanse the air, reduce asthma and heat-related illnesses, save on heating/cooling energy costs, boost economies and support American jobs -- usually at the same or lower cost than a purely "traditional" gray infrastructure solution.

    Larry Levine, a senior attorney in NRDC's Water Program said, "We already know green infrastructure solves massive urban stormwater problems, but we need to pick up the pace of implementation by using the full toolkit of public investment, smarter regulations, and innovative private financing approaches." Alisa Valderrama, senior project finance attorney in NRDC's Center for Market Innovation said, "The time is ripe for partners from the private and public sector to work together towards cities that have cleaner water, greener neighborhoods, and decreased tax payer burdens."

    NatLab develops large-scale financing solutions to help cities leverage private capital for green infrastructure investments.  NatLab's work since 2012 has focused on Philadelphia, but the efforts in Philadelphia aim to shed light on a range of strategies that many cities can utilize to help draw from private investment capital to "green" their approach to stormwater management. NRDC indicates that this first-of-its-kind resource comes opportunely, as many cities are urgently seeking financing for much-needed upgrades to their sewer and stormwater infrastructure. Additionally, this summer, the EPA considers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to expand the robust deployment of green infrastructure by reforming its national requirements designed to tackle urban runoff. A proposed clean water rule to reduce polluted runoff and enhance community livability is expected to be announced in June 2013.

    Eron Bloomgarden, partner at EKO Asset Management Partners said, "Harnessing natural infrastructure in the transition from gray to green is of enormous interest to investors, including family offices, foundations, endowments, pension funds and other large institutional investors. Private capital can play an important role to support this transition, and NatLab's work in Philadelphia points the way to several promising investment opportunities that also have meaningful environmental and community benefits."

    According to a release, Philadelphia, which is expected to deploy an estimated public investment of at least $1.67 billion over the next 25 years in stormwater retrofit projects, is leading the way on green infrastructure in America -- developing policies which include innovative fee and credit systems with tremendous potential for stimulating private investment and providing attractive rates of return for project developers. The city's flagship stormwater billing structure provides a significant discount for non-residential property owners if they manage to keep the first inch of rainfall on their property through green practices, rather than letting the stormwater runoff flow into municipal systems.

    Howard Neukrug, Water Commissioner of PWD said, "Leveraging public-private partnerships can help transform and green our City water systems in a brilliantly cost-effective way. PWD has long been incubating and testing financial and programmatic approaches to accelerate the pace of green acre development, our community resilience and other community benefits associated with green infrastructure. We appreciate the Rockefeller Foundation's support and NatLab's collaboration with the Philadelphia Water Department in advancing these potentially game-changing tools."

    While Philadelphia is a leader in deploying green infrastructure, cities around the nation are also pursuing significant green infrastructure investments including: New York City: $1.6 billion over 20 years; Los Angeles: approximately $200 million in the next two years; Kansas City, Mo.: $78 million; Portland, Ore.: $68 million from 2008-2013; Detroit: $50 million over 20 years; Cleveland: $42 million; and Seattle: $24-30 million from 2012-2018.

    Access a release from NRDC (click here). Access an overview and link to the complete 87-page Creating Clean Water Cash Flows report (click here). Access the companion 134-page Greening Vacant Lots report (click here). Access NRDC's 36-page report on Financing Stormwater Retrofits in Philadelphia and Beyond (click here). Access the EKO Asset website for more information (click here). [#Water/Stormwater]

WIMS 24/7 News  Blogs

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Wednesday, March 06, 2013

Policy Choices Will Determine Future Of U.S. Clean Energy Industry

Mar 6: A report released by The Pew Charitable Trusts indicates that the United States and China traded more than $8.5 billion worth of clean energy goods and services in 2011, the latest year for which data are available. U.S. companies enjoyed a $1.63 billion sales advantage over their Chinese counterparts. The report, based on data compiled by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, Pew's research partner for clean energy, provides insight into the complex and interdependent nature of trade between the world's two largest economies. 

    The report, Advantage America: The U.S.-China Clean Energy Trade Relationship in 2011, concludes that America's clean energy trade strength is derived from leadership in innovation and entrepreneurship, as well as the global presence of U.S. companies. China's clean energy industry has an advantage in large-scale manufacturing and high-volume assembly of certain clean energy products. However, tensions have been heightened in recent years by fiercely competitive market conditions affecting companies in both countries, as well as several high-profile trade cases. 

    Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew's clean energy program said, "The report findings underscore the long-term economic potential for U.S. leadership in the clean energy sector. Advantage America demonstrates the payoff for our leadership in wind, solar, and energy smart technology innovation. U.S. companies are tapping into the growing worldwide demand for clean energy goods and services. But, to maintain our competitive edge, it is essential that policymakers recognize and enhance domestic policies that help position U.S. companies for success -- investing in research and development, encouraging domestic demand, and supporting overseas sales." Among the report's major findings:
  • Solar Energy—These products constituted the largest component of clean energy trade for both countries. Combined, firms based in the two nations traded more than $6.5 billion worth of products and services in 2011. Chinese firms sell large quantities of finished solar cells and modules to the United States, which led in sales of high value-added goods and services, such as polysilicon and wafers, as well as the high-tech materials and equipment needed in solar manufacturing. On a net basis, the United States enjoyed a $913 million surplus in the solar sector.
  • Wind Energy—This was the smallest of the three clean energy trade sectors examined in the report. Overall, more than $923 million worth of wind energy goods and services were exchanged between the two countries in 2011. As with solar, the U.S. wind industry excels in sales of relatively high-margin specialty materials (fiberglass) and sensitive electronic and other control systems. China's largest sales were in turbine towers and rotors. Overall, U.S. firms held a net trade surplus of just over $146 million. 
  • Energy Smart Technologies—This sector includes a suite of technologies, services, and products that can help improve energy performance and/or efficiency, store energy, and reduce carbon emissions. Energy smart technologies traded between the United States and China include smart meters, light emitting diodes (LEDs), advanced lithium-ion batteries, and electric vehicles. More than $1.1 billion worth of these products flowed between the two countries, with the United States held a net trade surplus of $571 million in the sector.

    Hoil Kim, vice president and general counsel of GT Advanced Technologies said, "Clean energy technologies, such as solar PV and LED lighting, represent growing global markets for U.S. companies like GT Advanced Technologies with increasing competition from countries like China. In order to build on our country's strengths in innovation and advanced manufacturing, we need to establish a long-term, consistent energy and trade policies that will enhance research and development, grow exports and spur job growth in the United States." The report concludes that:

  • The United States held a $1.63 billion trade advantage over China in 2011 across the three sectors. The United States enjoyed a surplus in all three major clean energy sectors, with solar energy accounting for 56 percent of the overall advantage and energy smart technologies accounting for 35 percent of the surplus. 
  • U.S. firms have an advantage based on national leadership in innovation and entrepreneurship. U.S. companies excel in production and sale of complex, high-margin, and performance-critical goods. They include capital equipment for manufacturing solar panels and LEDs, specialty chemicals and materials needed for production of solar and wind products, and controls for energy systems. 
  • U.S. companies are more active overseas than their Chinese counterparts, which have only small U.S. assembly operations for clean energy equipment. The U.S. trade advantage over China increased by more than $1.1 billion (to a total of $1.63 billion) when the global footprints of U.S. firms manufacturing products overseas were taken into account. 
  • China's strength is based on large-scale assembly and high-volume manufacturing. The data show that Chinese firms are relied upon for large-scale manufacture and high-volume assembly of finished products such as solar modules and LED fixtures.
  • Uncertainties surrounding U.S. clean energy policies are likely to have the greatest impact on domestic manufacturing in the clean energy industry. In the United States, clean energy policy is in a state of flux. Much of the demand associated with state-based renewable energy goals and standards has been met. Several key Federal initiatives have expired or will soon expire, such as the Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit, the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee program for renewable energy deployment, and the Department of Treasury's clean energy grants initiative. In addition, the Production Tax Credit and Investment Tax Credit face an uncertain future in ongoing tax and budget policy discussions. Policy choices, not China's exports, will determine the direction of the U.S. clean energy industry in the months and years ahead. 
    Access a release from Pew Charitable Trusts (click here). Access an overview and link to related information (click here). Access the complete 36-page report (click here). [#EnergyClean]
 
GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

Stolen Apes: The Illicit Trade Linked To Organized Crime

Mar 4:  A United Nations report released at the UN-backed Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) now underway in Bangkok, Thailand, indicates that almost 3,000 live great apes are stolen annually from the forests of Africa and Southeast Asia in an illicit trade which they say is increasingly linked to organized crime and trans-boundary networks that move the animals in the same ways as drugs, arms and laundered money. The report, Stolen Apes: The Illicit Trade in Chimpanzees, Gorillas, Bonobos and Orangutans, produced by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) through the Great Apes Survival Partnership (GRASP), estimates that at least 22,218 great apes have been lost from the wild since 2005 -- either sold, killed during the hunt, or dying in captivity -- with chimpanzees comprising 64 per cent of that number.

    UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner said in a press release, "The current scale outlined in this report underlines how important it is that the international community and the organizations responsible for conserving endangered species remain vigilant, keeping a step ahead of those seeking to profit from such illegal activities." The report shows that the cause of this illegal trade shifted from traditional conservation threats such as deforestation, mining and bush-meat hunting, to a more sophisticated business driven by demand from international markets.

    According to figures cited in the report, a poacher may sell a live chimpanzee for $50, whereas the middleman will resell that same chimpanzee at a mark-up of as much as 400 per cent. Orangutans can fetch $1,000 at re-sale, and gorillas illegally sold to a zoo in Malaysia in 2002 reportedly went for $400,000 each. Doug Cress, the coordinator of GRASP said, "It is important to establish baseline figures for the illegal trade in great apes, even if these numbers only hint at the devastation. Great apes are extremely important for the health of forests in Africa and Asia, and even the loss of 10 or 20 at a time can have a deep impact on biodiversity."

    The UN General Assembly declared the period 2011-2020 as the UN Decade on Biodiversity to promote the implementation of a strategic plan on biodiversity and its overall vision of preserving and properly managing the different types of animals and plants. According to the report, the loss of natural habitats further drives the illegal trade, pitting people against the animals. Great ape habitat is being lost at the rate of 2-5 per cent annually. By 2030, less than 10 per cent of the current range will remain on current trends.

    Among its recommendations, the report urges increased enforcement of protected areas, to both reduce illegal trade in great apes and to protect their habitat. The report indicates that law enforcement for crimes related to illicit great ape trade is lagging. Only 27 arrests were made in Africa and Asia in connection with great ape trade between 2005 and 2011, and one-fourth of the arrests were never prosecuted. The report is the first report to analyze the scale and scope of the illegal trade and highlight the growing links to sophisticated trans-boundary crime networks, which law enforcement networks are struggling to contain.

    Access a release from the UN (click here). Access a more detailed release from UNEP with links to related information (click here). Access a direct link to the Stolen Apes 56-page report (click here). Access the CITES website (click here). [#Wildlife]

WIMS 24/7 News  Blogs

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Monday, March 04, 2013

State Department Issues Draft EIS For Keystone XL Pipeline

Mar 1: The U.S. Department of State (DOS) released a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) late Friday afternoon in response to TransCanada's May 2012 application for the Keystone XL pipeline that would run from Canada to Nebraska. The document is a draft technical review of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project, including: impacts from construction, impacts from potential spills, impacts related to climate change, and economic impacts.
 
    A 45-day public comment period will begin when U.S. EPA posts the Draft SEIS on its website, a process that generally takes about one week following today's submission of the document to that agency. Specific instructions about how to submit comments will be provided via the Federal Register and on the State Department Keystone XL website. After the end of the public comment period, the Department will consider comments received and prepare a Final SEIS. The National Interest Determination period will begin following the release of the Final SEIS, during which time the Department will obtain the views of other agencies about whether to grant or deny the permit.
 
    In releasing the draft SEIS, Kerri-Ann Jones the Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs at DOS conducted a press briefing teleconference to explain the release and the process going forward. The pipeline crosses the U.S.-Canada border near Morgan, Montana, passes through Montana then South Dakota and Nebraska, and terminates in Steel City, Nebraska.
 
    The first question from the press related to one of the major issues raised by environmental organizations in opposition to the pipeline -- i.e. about the greenhouse gas emission impacts of the tar sands in the pipeline. DOS responded:
". . .the greenhouse gas question and the relationship to climate is a very important topic, and what we have done in the draft supplemental is we have looked at the greenhouse gas impact from a number of ways, both the overall lifecycle of greenhouse gas emission related to the oil that would be moving through this pipeline, as well as how the construction of the pipeline might influence the overall development of the oil sands.
 
"And I think that this has been an area of great interest, and as I said in my opening comments, this is a draft SEIS, and it's a preliminary document. We're very anxious to have a lot of public comment. But with this preliminary analysis, we find in this draft that the approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project, including this proposed project, really remains unlikely to significantly impact the rate of development of the oil sands, or the continued demand for heavy crude oil in the U.S. But let me reiterate that this is a draft document, and we're anxious to get a lot of comments from the public and to have a lot of discussion about this document. . ."
    The second question indicated that according to the DOS analysis it looks like "part of what the analysis is showing is that, in fact, in terms of the next decade, we would not need this pipeline to get the 830,000 barrels of oil a day to the United States." DOS responded:
"You raise a good question. Certainly, that is one of the areas we look at in the draft and that's sort of in the discussion where we look at alternatives. We have a very robust discussion of alternatives, including the no-action alternative, where what we look at is what would happen if this pipeline were not to be built, what would happen with other forms of transport, not just pipelines, but rail and barge. And also we look at what would happen to -- with the existing pipeline structure. Would there be other changes or modifications for that? So there is a tremendous amount of analysis in this draft on that very issue, and I would refer you to that. . ."
    Considering the fact, that the document was just release and very few people had a chance to even begin review it, a question was asked, "We literally have only just opened this report up and it's very dense and very comprehensive. But could you tell us, overall, if you found the environmental impact of the pipeline would be significant or would it meet the standards that you need for an eventual approval to go ahead?"
Well, as I said in my opening remarks, again, this is a draft. And so while there is a section where there is a summary discussion, I don't think it's -- I think it's somewhat premature to get into that, because we feel that we need to have a public debate. We covered a range of issues regarding what could be environmental impacts, covering what's been already mentioned on this call -- greenhouse gases and climate considerations -- as well as groundwater, as well as the ability when you're passing through somewhat fragile areas, the effects on threatened and endangered species. So I would just refer you to the summary piece and just say I think it's premature at this point to really try to come down with strong conclusions, as we want to make sure we get a lot of comments on this and we have a full public debate about the document.
    Section 4.15, Cumulative Effects Assessment of the SEIS, presents information and analysis regarding indirect cumulative impacts and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions including the potential impact of further development of the oil sands on climate change. Environmental groups have argued that Keystone XL tar sands project would pipe some of the dirtiest oil on the planet through the breadbasket of America to be shipped overseas through the Gulf of Mexico. It would be a disaster for our climate, producing tar sands crude that kicks out two or three times as much carbon pollution as producing conventional crude oil [See WIMS 2/19/13].
 
    DOS indicates in the SEIS, that previous comments received included requests for analysis of the potential climate impacts of increasing development of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) oil sands associated with the proposed Project. DOS says, "While such a broad review is typically beyond the scope of NEPA, this Supplemental EIS nonetheless presents information and analysis related to the proposed Project's potential life-cycle climate impacts." Among some of the findings, the SEIS concludes:
  • it is unlikely that the proposed Project construction would have a substantial impact on the rate of WCSB oil sands development
  • Producing a barrel of premium fuels (i.e., gasoline, diesel, and kerosene/jet fuel) from bitumen produces roughly the same amount of petroleum coke as a barrel of premium fuels refined from heavy crudes, such as Venezuelan Bachaquero or Mexican Maya.
  • The relative GHG-intensity of both reference crudes and oil sands-derived crudes will change differently over time. Conventional (deep) crude reservoirs require higher energy intensive secondary and tertiary production techniques as the reservoirs deplete and as water cut of the produced reservoir fluids increases. Oil sands surface mining is expected to have a relatively constant energy intensity long into the future.
    Obviously, many groups, organizations and legislators are reacting to the draft SEIS release -- too many to cover in-depth here. The following are a few representative reactions:
 
    TransCanada Corporation, the project developer responded to the draft SEIS saying in a release, "While TransCanada is still reviewing the DSEIS, it builds on more than 10,000 pages of review already completed for Keystone XL. The DSEIS reaffirmed that 'there would be no significant impacts to most resources along the proposed Project route.' It noted that Keystone XL would result in no 'substantive change in global GHG emissions' and it is 'unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the oil sands, or on the amount of heavy crude oil refined in the Gulf Coast area.' Finally, it also noted that 'the denial of a Presidential Permit would likely result in actions by other firms in the United States (and global) petroleum market, such as use of alternative modes to transport WCSB and Bakken crude.'"

    Russ Girling, TransCanada's president and chief executive officer said, "Completing the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Keystone XL is an important step towards receiving a Presidential Permit for this critical energy infrastructure project. No one has a stronger interest than TransCanada does in making sure that Keystone XL operates safely, and more than four years of exhaustive study and environmental review show the care and attention we have placed on ensuring this is the safest oil pipeline built to date in the United States."

    The House Energy and Commerce (E&C) Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY) issued a statement saying, "The SEIS findings confirm what we already knew --   this pipeline is safe and in the best interest of the American people. There are no legitimate reasons not to move forward on the landmark jobs project. The president should stand up for families and immediately approve the Keystone XL pipeline.  It has been over four years since TransCanada first applied for a permit to build this pipeline that will bring jobs and energy security to America. At a time when gas prices are rising toward $4.00 a gallon, we must use every available tool we can to increase America's access to affordable and secure energy supplies. It should be a no-brainer to approve Keystone and accept Canada's oil. The Obama administration's unnecessary delays have prevented the pipeline's construction from moving forward, and in turn, put the project at risk. As China covets Canada's abundant oil resources, we can't afford to wait any longer.

    "The SEIS findings suggest the president should approve the pipeline's permit, but we were in a similar situation last year and the president chose to ignore the evidence and reject the middle class jobs project. Sadly, there is still no guarantee this pipeline will be approved absent an act of Congress. We fear the delays have allowed the opposition to grow so out-of-control that congressional action is still necessary to get the pipeline built."

    E&C Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) issued a brief statement saying, "The draft impact statement appears to be seriously flawed. We don't need this dirty oil. To stop climate change and the destructive storms, droughts, floods, and wildfires that we are already experiencing, we should be investing in clean energy, not building a pipeline that will speed the exploitation of Canada's highly polluting tar sands."  

    The American Petroleum Institute (API) issued a statement saying, "No matter how many times KXL is reviewed, the result is the same: no significant environmental impact. The latest impact statement from the State Department puts this important, job-creating project one step closer to reality. Nebraska has finished its final Keystone XL assessment and the governor has given it his full support. The last approval needed is by President Obama, and we urge him to do so as soon as possible. The president could truly implement his 'all of the above' energy strategy by approving Keystone XL. We hope the president will choose to side with the American people who strongly support the pipeline in poll after poll. The project will create thousands of good paying jobs for the safest, most highly trained workers of the building trades at a time when construction workers have an unemployment rate higher than the national average. Keystone XL will also enhance our energy security. It would be a win win for the U.S."

    Karen Harbert, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for 21st Century Energy, issued a statement saying, "The Environmental Impact Statement released today is long overdue, and continues to build a strong case supporting the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. The Keystone XL project has become one of the most closely examined infrastructure projects in our nation's history -- and it continues to pass with flying colors. Once again, the State Department has confirmed that this project is environmentally sound. The Keystone XL pipeline will make more Canadian and U.S. oil available to us—oil that will not need to be imported from unfriendly places.  It will create thousands of jobs and generate millions in revenue for state and local governments that badly need them. We'll be working over the next 45 days to ensure that the voice of the majority of American people, who favor this project, is heard loud and clear by the Obama Administration."
 
    The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) indicated that its experts have begun analyzing the draft SEIS and indicate that they have found numerous major flaws, including:
  • Climate Impacts:  The analysis minimizes the climate impacts of up to 830,000 barrels per day of tar sands -- which has been termed "the dirtiest oil on the planet" due to its high-carbon liabilities. Building this pipeline would be the same as putting 6 million new cars on the road. And that doesn't even account for emissions that come from petroleum coke, which would increase carbon pollution from Keystone XL by an additional 13 percent. But the draft SEIS discounted this carbon pollution. 
  • Tar Sands Development: The State Department analysis specifically avoids the impact that this project would have in empowering a tripling of tar sands oil production by noting that the oil would be delivered in other ways, despite very clear evidence and press reporting in Canada to the contrary.
  • Water Impacts: In a significant change from the first environmental impact study, the State Department now acknowledges that the acidic and corrosive properties of diluted bitumen (a rawer form of tar sands oil that would flow through the pipeline) has elevated safety risks compared to conventional oil, and requires new response strategies to deal with spills in water. The ongoing cleanup of the nation's biggest inland oil spill two and a half years ago -- in Michigan's Kalamazoo River -- illustrates the danger underplayed in the draft report.
    Access the DOS press briefing (click here). Access a DOS brief fact sheet on the draft SEIS (click here). Access the detailed draft SEIS with executive summary, each section and appendices (click here). Access the DOS Keystone XL New Application website for updates and links to information (click here). Access a release from the E&C Committee Republicans (click here). Access a release from the E&C Committee Democrats (click here). Access a release from TransCanada (click here). Access the TransCanada KXL website for more information (click here). Access a release from API (click here). Access a release from the U.S. Chamber (click here). Access a release from NRDC with links to further analysis (click here).  [#Climate, #Energy/KXL]
 
GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Friday, March 01, 2013

Budget Sequestration In Effect; Just 27 Days Until Next "Crisis"

Mar 1: March 1 has arrived and the self-imposed budget sequester of $85 billion in Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 spending goes into effect despite the fact that most everyone agrees it will cause a critical disruption to the U.S. economy [See WIMS 2/26/13]. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and Texas Instruments have said the cuts are a "self-inflicted body blow" to the American economy [See WIMS 2/11/13]. Yet, with very little effort on the part of Washington Democrats and Republicans to avoid the "crisis", the disruptive cuts were allowed to go into effect. Because government moves slowly, it will take some time for the impacts of the sequester cuts to be felt. A last minute meeting called by the President for today (March 1) with House and Senate leadership will have little meaning, as the House and Senate have adjourned and left town. The President is required by law to order the sequester by the end of the day.
 
    Now, there are just 27 days until the next major, self-inflicted budget crisis -- the Continuing Budget Resolution (CR) -- which was put off until March 27, because no agreement could be reached. If not addressed, or put off again, the Federal government will shut down. Then, its just a few more months until Washington again deals with the debate over raising the "debt ceiling" again.
 
    President Obama issued a statement on the sequestration saying, "Today, Republicans in the Senate faced a choice about how to grow our economy and reduce our deficit. And instead of closing a single tax loophole that benefits the well-off and well-connected, they chose to cut vital services for children, seniors, our men and women in uniform and their families.  They voted to let the entire burden of deficit reduction fall squarely on the middle class.

    "I believe we should do better. We should work together to reduce our deficit in a balanced way – by making smart spending cuts and closing special interest tax loopholes.  That's exactly the kind of plan Democrats in the Senate have proposed.  But even though a majority of Senators support this approach, Republicans have refused to allow it an up-or-down vote – threatening our economy with a series of arbitrary, automatic budget cuts that will cost us jobs and slow our recovery.

    "Tomorrow [March 1] I will bring together leaders from both parties to discuss a path forward. As a nation, we can't keep lurching from one manufactured crisis to another. Middle-class families can't keep paying the price for dysfunction in Washington.  We can build on the over $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction we've already achieved, but doing so will require Republicans to compromise.  That's how our democracy works, and that's what the American people deserve."   

    At 11:30 AM today, the President delivered a lengthy statement and held a press briefing answering detailed questions from reporters on the process which lead to the sequester, the anticipated impacts, and the future prospects of budget negotiations with Congress. He said, in part:
"As you know, I just met with leaders of both parties to discuss a way forward in light of the severe budget cuts that start to take effect today.  I told them these cuts will hurt our economy.  They will cost us jobs.  And to set it right, both sides need to be willing to compromise.

"The good news is the American people are strong and they're resilient.  They fought hard to recover from the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and we will get through this as well.  Even with these cuts in place, folks all across this country will work hard to make sure that we keep the recovery going.  But Washington sure isn't making it easy.  At a time when our businesses have finally begun to get some traction -- hiring new workers, bringing jobs back to America -- we shouldn't be making a series of dumb, arbitrary cuts to things that businesses depend on and workers depend on, like education, and research, and infrastructure and defense.  It's unnecessary.  And at a time when too many Americans are still looking for work, it's inexcusable. . .

"The longer these cuts remain in place, the greater the damage to our economy -- a slow grind that will intensify with each passing day. . . I do believe that we can and must replace these cuts with a more balanced approach that asks something from everybody:  Smart spending cuts; entitlement reform; tax reform that makes the tax code more fair for families and businesses without raising tax rates --  all so that we can responsibly lower the deficit without laying off workers, or forcing parents to scramble for childcare, or slashing financial aid for college students.

"I don't think that's too much to ask.  I don't think that is partisan.  It's the kind of approach that I've proposed for two years.  It's what I ran on last year.  And the majority of the American people agree with me in this approach, including, by the way, a majority of Republicans.  We just need Republicans in Congress to catch up with their own party and their country on this. . ."

    Access a 2/28 statement from the President (click here). Access the 3/1 statement from the President and responses to questions from the press (click here). Access the White House blog posting on the Sequester impacts, background and links to the state by state reports (click here). Access the Senate Appropriations Committee, "Impacts of Sequestration" website with agency letters and testimony (click here). Access the House Appropriations Committee Democratic report of February 13, 2013, on sequestration for more background and details (click here). Access the House Republican's website on the Sequester (click here). [#All, #MIAll]

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Shell Backs Off Arctic Alaska Drilling For Now

Feb 27: Royal Dutch Shell plc (Shell) announced it will "pause its exploration drilling activity for 2013 in Alaska's Beaufort and Chukchi Seas [See WIMS 9/5/12] to prepare equipment and plans for a resumption of activity at a later stage." Marvin Odum, Director, Upstream Americas said, "We've made progress in Alaska, but this is a long-term programme that we are pursuing in a safe and measured way. Our decision to pause in 2013 will give us time to ensure the readiness of all our equipment and people following the drilling season in 2012."

    In a release Shell indicated that Alaska holds important energy resources. At the same time, securing access to those resources requires special expertise, technology and an in depth understanding of the environmental and societal sensitivities unique to the region. Shell is one of the leaders in an industry move into offshore Arctic exploration. The company continues to use its extensive experience in Arctic and sub-Arctic environments to prepare for safe activities in Alaska. Alaska remains an area with high potential for Shell over the long term, and the company is committed to drill there again in the future. If exploration proves successful, resources there would take years to develop.

    Shell completed top-hole drilling on two wells in 2012 in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, marking the industry's return to offshore drilling in the Alaskan Arctic after more than a decade. This drilling was completed safely, with no serious injuries or environmental impact. After the drilling season ended, however, one of Shell's drilling rigs, the Kulluk, was damaged in a maritime incident related to strong weather conditions. The Kulluk and the second drilling rig, the Noble Discoverer, will be towed to locations in Asia for maintenance and repairs.

    Odum said, "Shell remains committed to building an Arctic exploration program that provides confidence to stakeholders and regulators, and meets the high standards the company applies to its operations around the world. We continue to believe that a measured and responsible pace, especially in the exploration phase, fits best in this remote area.

    U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), the Ranking Member on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released a statement saying, "I have been a strong supporter of Shell's activities in the waters off Alaska's northern coastline and in energy exploration in general, but I have always said that it must be done to the highest safety standards. Shell's decision to postpone this summer's exploratory drilling program shows that it shares that commitment to safety. This pause -- and it is only a pause in a multi-year drilling program that will ultimately provide great benefits both to the state of Alaska and the nation as a whole -- is necessary for Shell to repair its ships and make the necessary updates to its exploration plans that will ensure a safe return to exploration soon."

    Representative Ed Markey (D-MA), the Ranking Member on the House Natural Resources Committee, who has been questioning and exposing issues with Shell's Arctic endeavors said this was the right decision on the part of Shell, and asked the Department of Interior to expand its current expedited review of Arctic drilling prospects, given additional time this postponement now allows. He indicated among the incidents were catastrophic failures of proposed containment systems, one of two drilling ships running aground while being towed through a storm to avoid tax considerations, and another ship receiving 16 safety and performance violations. Rep. Markey said, "After bumbling through a year of mishaps, beachings, and complete safety failures, it's clear that Shell and the oil industry were not ready to drill in the Arctic. This postponement is the right decision and should allow the Department of Interior the time it needs to do a full review of the oil industry's capability to handle the harsh conditions in the Arctic."

    A number of environmental organizations issued statements including Greenpeace, Earthjustice, Wilderness Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club and others (See links below). Greenpeace said it welcomed the announcement and Phil Radford, Greenpeace USA Executive Director said in response said, "This is the first thing Shell's done right in Alaska -- calling it quits. Shell was supposed to be the best of the best, but the long list of mishaps and near-disasters is a clear indication even the 'best' companies can't succeed in Arctic drilling. Secretary Salazar and President Obama gave drilling a chance; now the responsible decision is to make Arctic drilling off limits, forever. . . "Shell's announcement today is an admission that the millions of people around the world were right to urge Obama to keep the company out of the Arctic. Now Obama needs to listen to the 2.7 million people who have signed on to #SaveTheArctic and make Arctic drilling off-limits forever."

    Earthjustice President, Trip Van Noppen, issued a statement saying, "Shell did the only thing it could do -- suspend Arctic drilling and halt operations for oil exploration this summer. Whether it was the Kulluk's grounding, the problems both drilling operations had with Arctic weather and ice, or the total failure of their oil spill containment system, Shell's drilling effort last summer demonstrated with vivid clarity that the oil industry is not ready to drill safely in the Arctic Ocean. The administration should take the time it needs to perform a thorough assessment of Shell's operations last summer, rather than a rushed review that fails to address the systemic failures -- both of the industry and the Department of the Interior. The Obama administration should now suspend all permitting and further activities related to Arctic drilling in America's waters until it completes a thorough review and determines a more responsible approach for the Arctic Ocean."

    Access a release from Shell (click here). Access a release from Senator Murkowski (click here). Access a release from Rep. Markey with links to his previous inquiries (click here). Access the statement from Greenpeace (click here). Access a release from Earthjustice (click here). Access a release from Wilderness Society including images and a chronology of events (click here). Access a release from Center for Biological Diversity (click here). Access a release from Sierra Club (click here). [#Energy/OCS]

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Bipartisan Policy Center Makes 50+ Energy Policy Recommendations

Feb 27: The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) unveiled a report at the National Press Club  -- America's Energy Resurgence: Sustaining Success, Confronting Challenges -- which includes over 50 energy policy recommendations developed by its Strategic Energy Policy Initiative, which is co-chaired by former Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND), former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS), General James Jones USMC (Ret.) and former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator William Reilly. Together, they led a diverse group of key stakeholders, including high-level industry executives, scientists, economists, environmental advocates, labor leaders and former government and elected officials through a lengthy, deliberative process.

    The group notes that the nation is undergoing an energy resurgence -- both in energy production and energy efficiency -- many energy challenges remain that demand high-level bipartisan attention. Over the last year and a half the group has been deliberating on policy options to diversify energy production, improve energy productivity through cost-effective energy efficiency, accelerate innovation and technology improvements, and improve energy policy governance and accountability. The consensus-based recommendations are aimed at all relevant policymakers -- state governments, Congress, Executive Branch agencies and local utilities.

    Former EPA Administrator Reilly said, "Our country faces great challenges in ensuring safe, reliable, affordable energy to power our economy and meet the needs of our citizens. At the same time, we have tremendous opportunities to improve the way we secure energy supplies and how we use them in transportation, buildings, and commerce. We need to exploit those opportunities and we need to ensure that energy policy is well integrated with environmental policy. Both are essential for the country's long-term well being." Former Sen. Dorgan said, "Our country is in a very different position in terms of energy supply than it was just a few years ago, and my home state's economy is flourishing as a result. We must use this era of energy abundance as the ideal time for driving a diversity of policies that can serve as a buffer in more difficult times."

    BPC President Jason Grumet said, "This report is proof that people with strong differences can develop a consensus plan to advance national energy policy. While Congress is not in a particularly collaborative mood, energy policy has often been a source of bipartisan agreement. Recent achievements in production, efficiency, and advanced technologies create an opportunity for Congress to legislate from a position of national strength. These detailed recommendations are designed to provide impetus for a serious legislative effort."

    The report indicates that the U.S. energy system should provide "affordable, secure, and reliable supplies of energy and strive for continuous improvement in environmental performance." The report outlines four overriding objectives to achieve the recommendations including: 1. Pursue a diverse portfolio of energy resources; 2. Improve the energy productivity of the economy; 3. Accelerate innovation and technology improvements across the energy sector; and 4. Improve energy policy governance and accountability.
 
    Under the diverse portfolio, the report calls for: • Expanding production of domestic oil and gas resources while improving the environmental performance of shale oil and gas development; • Supporting investments in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects; • Addressing barriers to maintaining a strong nuclear energy sector; • Encouraging renewable energy production and consumption through streamlined siting on federal lands, extended tax incentives, and increased Department of Defense (DOD) procurement; • Supporting alternative transportation fuels through local, state, and federal infrastructure investments and DOD procurement; • Evaluating training needs for a skilled and technical energy workforce and facilitating multi-stakeholder energy-sector training programs; • Avoiding restrictions on international trade of energy, in keeping with the nation's traditional commitment to free trade; and • Reviewing the full range of energy tax expenditures and developing a reasonable phase-out plan for those tax expenditures that constitute subsides for mature fuels and technologies.
 
    In the policy and governance area, the report recommends: • Developing a high-level National Energy Strategy, through a new National Energy Security Council, and conducting a companion Quadrennial Energy Review; and • Pairing the Strategy with a well-coordinated implementation plan that can respond to often unpredictable economic, political, and technological conditions and regularly tracking and reporting progress.
 
    In a lengthy blog posting, Frances Beinecke, President of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said the report "misses the mark in a number of significant ways. It fails to address the urgent need for policies to combat climate change and proposes a significant expansion of fossil fuel extraction in the United States." NRDC's Ralph Cavanagh, was a member of the BPC Energy Board that produced the report, but Beinecke indicates that, "Board members serve in their personal capacity, not as representatives of their companies or organizations. And as noted in the report's introduction, signing the report does not indicate agreement with all of the report's recommendations." She said both Cavanaugh and NRDC disagree with the report's conclusions and recommendations on "dirty energy development."
 
    NRDC said the report is off-base in its "embrace of vastly expanded oil and gas production"; failure to discuss "the toll oil and gas development takes on our shared public lands"; a "skewed approach to offshore drilling"; and its allegation that seismic exploration mitigation measures for Atlantic drilling are "too expensive and potentially impossible to conduct." But, NRDC indicates that "the report does provide a strong plan for how to expand America's cleanest and safest energy resources: efficiency and renewables."
 
    NRDC also emphasizes that, ". . .perhaps most interesting, given recent political fights, the report also calls for extending the renewable energy production tax credit (now set to expire in 2013) through the end of 2016, while calling for a phase-out of all federal tax subsidies for mature energy technologies (including longtime fossil fuel beneficiaries). That's an important twin policy goal that will advance our growing clean energy sector." NRDC concludes that while it "does not consider this report, as a whole, to be a blueprint for how our nation can curb carbon emissions and build a stronger, more sustainable energy future, we welcome the strides made in reaching a bipartisan consensus on efficiency, renewables, and other innovations. It's those clean energy proposals that we can and will support."
 
     Other members on the BPC Energy Board included high-ranking representative from: Marathon Oil Corporation; Exxon Mobil Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Booz Allen Hamilton; Anadarko Petroleum Corporation; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Exelon Corporation; Arkansas Public Service Commission; Sandia National Laboratories; DuPont; American Council on Renewable Energy; BNSF Railway Company; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Southern Company Services, Inc.; and Analysis Group (and Former Assistant Secretary for Policy, U.S. Department of Energy).

    Access a release from the BPC (click here). Access a report overview and link to the complete 188-page report and a 5-page summary (click here). Access a video of the report release event at the National Press Club (click here). Access the Strategic Energy Policy Initiative website for additional information (click here). Access the complete NRDC blog posting (click here). [#Energy]

GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
You can review recent issues of eNewsUSA (click here)
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals